Climate and Ecosystem of Arid and Semi-arid Regions

Climate and Ecosystem of Arid and Semi-arid Regions

The Role of Perceived Environmental Experience Quality in Enhancing Tourists’ Responsible Behavior in Ecotourism Accommodations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 MSc Student in Tourism Management, Department of Tourism, Faculty of Tourism, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Arid and Semi-arid Regions, Faculty of Desert Studies, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran
10.22075/ceasr.2026.42434.1075
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Ecolodges have emerged as an important model of sustainable tourism in rural areas of Iran, offering opportunities for environmental protection, local participation, and responsible visitor experiences. In these settings, green infrastructure and environmentally friendly technologies are necessary, but they are not sufficient on their own to ensure sustainable tourist conduct. What may be more influential is the quality of the environmental experience perceived by tourists during their stay. When visitors perceive environmental practices as visible, meaningful, and engaging, these experiences can shape their attitudes, strengthen their intentions, and ultimately encourage responsible behavior. Despite the growing importance of ecolodges in sustainable tourism, previous studies have rarely examined how perceived environmental experience quality is translated into environmentally responsible behavior. In particular, the mediating role of behavioral intention in this relationship has received limited attention. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the effect of perceived environmental experience quality on tourists’ environmentally responsible behavior in Iranian ecolodges, with behavioral intention examined as a mediating variable.

Materials and Methods: This research employs an applied approach within a descriptive-correlational framework. The target population comprised tourists with at least one overnight stay in Iranian ecolodges. Data were gathered from 200 respondents using an online survey and non-probability convenience sampling. To ensure geographical representation, data collection targeted tourists across diverse climatic zones (including Northern, Desert-Central, and Mountainous regions). The sample size was rigorously justified using a-priori power analysis (G*Power 3.1; α=0.05, effect size=0.15, power=0.95) and the “10-times rule of thumb” for PLS-SEM. The study constructs—perceived environmental experience quality, behavioral intention, and environmentally responsible behavior—were assessed using a five-point Likert scale, with items adapted from established literature and contextualized for the ecolodge setting. Psychometric properties were strictly verified: reliability was assessed via Cronbach’s alpha and Composite Reliability (CR), while validity was confirmed through convergent validity (Average Variance Extracted - AVE) and discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion and HTMT ratio). Structural relationships were analyzed via Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 4. The significance of direct and indirect paths was validated using bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of the mediating role of behavioral intention in the relationship between environmental experience quality and responsible behavior.

Results: The results showed that perceived environmental experience had a positive and statistically significant effect on behavioral intention. In other words, tourists who perceived their environmental experience in ecolodges more positively were more likely to develop intentions consistent with responsible conduct. The findings also revealed a significant positive direct effect of perceived environmental experience on environmentally responsible behavior, indicating that the experience itself can directly stimulate responsible actions. Furthermore, behavioral intention was found to be a strong predictor of environmentally responsible behavior, confirming that intention is an important determinant of actual tourist behavior. The mediation analysis also demonstrated that behavioral intention plays a significant mediating role in the relationship between perceived environmental experience and environmentally responsible behavior. In sum, all hypothesized relationships were supported, and the model showed that environmental experience quality influences responsible behavior both directly and indirectly. The article also emphasizes that environmentally responsible behavior is more likely when environmental practices are not only present but are experienced by tourists as visible, participatory, and meaningful.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that the quality of environmental experience perceived by tourists in ecolodges plays a crucial role in promoting environmentally responsible behavior. This effect occurs both directly and through the strengthening of behavioral intention. The study suggests that sustainability in ecolodges should not be understood merely in terms of physical green infrastructure, but also in terms of how environmental practices are experienced and perceived by visitors. Ecolodge managers should therefore deliberately design environmental experiences that are observable, interactive, and memorable. Clear communication of green actions, demonstration of resource-saving outcomes, and opportunities for tourist participation can increase both intention and responsible conduct. At the policy level, rural tourism authorities should include environmental-experience-quality indicators in ecolodge evaluation, certification, and rating systems. Such an approach would help move sustainable tourism assessment beyond infrastructure alone and toward a more visitor-centered understanding of environmental responsibility.
Keywords
Subjects

1.     Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.     Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
3.     Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Sutherland, L. A. (2011). Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: Implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management, 32(4), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.012
4.     Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2(2), 285–309.
5.     Chan, E. S. W., & Hsu, C. H. C. (2016). Environmental management research in hospitality. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(5), 886–923. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2015-0076
6.     Chua, B. L., & Han, H. (2022). Green hotels: The state of green hotel research and future prospects. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 39(5), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2022.2136329
7.     Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
8.     Fu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2024). Applying the theory of planned behavior to understand ecotourism behavior: The role of human–land coordination and self-mastery. Sustainability, 16(21), Article 9248. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219248
9.     Gössling, S., Scott, D., & Hall, C. M. (2021). Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708
10.  Greene, D., Demeter, C., & Dolnicar, S. (2024). The comparative effectiveness of interventions aimed at making tourists behave in more environmentally sustainable ways: A meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 63(5), 1239–1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231183701
11.  Guo, Y., Yu, M., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Impact of destination advertising on tourists’ visit intention: The influence of self-congruence, self-confidence, and destination reputation. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 31, Article 100852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2023.100852
12.  Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
13.  Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(7), 1021–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1903019
14.  IPCC. (2023). Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
15.  Juvan, E., & Dolnicar, S. (2017). Drivers of pro-environmental tourist behaviours are not universal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 879–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.087
16.  Kwon, J., & Boger, C. A. (2021). Influence of brand experience on customer inspiration and pro-environmental intention. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(8), 1154–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1769571
17.  Lee, T. H., Jan, F. H., & Yang, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists. Tourism Management, 36, 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.012
18.  Li, J., Coca-Stefaniak, J. A., Nguyen, T. H. H., & Morrison, A. M. (2024). Sustainable tourist behavior: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 3356–3374. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2859
19.  Luo, B., Bai, Y., & Zhang, M. (2024). Being there: How sensory impressions influence tourists’ pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 59, 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.04.014
20.  Nasiri, N., & Moradpour, R. (2025). The influence of architectural features of ecolodge on ecotourists’ satisfaction and destination loyalty (Case study: North Khorasan province, Iran). Tourism Management Studies, 19(68), 363–410. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2024.80597.2951
21.  Pourtaheri, M., Torabi, Z. A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., Sajadi, S., & Hall, C. M. (2024). Ecolodge tourism dynamics: A village-level analysis of marketing and policy indicators in Iran’s Hawraman Region. Sustainability, 16(12), Article 5072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125072
22.  Qiu, H., Wang, X., Wu, M. Y., Wei, W., Morrison, A. M., & Kelly, C. (2023). The effect of destination source credibility on tourist environmentally responsible behavior: An application of stimulus-organism-response theory. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(8), 1797–1817. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2022.2067167
23.  Sharpley, R. (2020). Tourism, sustainable development and the theoretical divide: 20 years on. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(11), 1932–1946. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1779732
24.  Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
25.  Su, L., Swanson, S. R., & Chen, X. (2016). The effects of perceived service quality on repurchase intentions and subjective well-being of Chinese tourists: The mediating role of relationship quality. Tourism Management, 52, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.06.012
26.  Torabi, Z. A. (2024). Breaking barriers: How the rural poor engage in tourism activities without external support in selected Iranian villages. Frontiers in Sustainable Tourism, 3, Article 1404013. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsut.2024.1404013
27.  UNCCD. (2022). Global Land Outlook (2nd ed.). United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. https://www.unccd.int/resources/global-land-outlook/glo2
28.  Weng, L., Zhu, Y., Xu, X., Yang, J., Zheng, S., Liu, H., Wang, H., & Zhu, L. (2023). The influence of visitors’ recreation experience and environmental attitude on environmentally responsible behavior: A case study of an urban forest park, China. Forests, 14(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14010024
29.  Yeh, S. S., Guan, X., Chiang, T. Y., Ho, J. L., & Huan, T. C. (2021). Reinterpreting the theory of planned behavior and its application to green hotel consumption intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, Article 102827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102827
30.  Zhou, B., Wang, L., Huang, S., & Xiong, Q. (2023). Impact of perceived environmental restorativeness on tourists’ pro-environmental behavior: Examining the mediation of place attachment and the moderation of ecocentrism. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56, 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.08.006
Volume 3, Issue 1
August 2026
Pages 88-103

  • Receive Date 23 July 2026
  • Revise Date 20 September 2026
  • Accept Date 21 September 2026