اقلیم و بوم سازگان مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک

اقلیم و بوم سازگان مناطق خشک و نیمه خشک

ارزیابی تخریب سرزمین در حوزه آبخیز پردیسان با روش ارزیابی ریسک تخریب سرزمین (RALDE)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه بیانزدایی، دانشکده کویرشناسی، دانشگاه سمنان
2 پژوهشگر موسسه تحقیقات جنگلها و مراتع
چکیده
تخریب سرزمین که حاصل تأثیرات منفی شرایط طبیعی و یا فعالیت‌های انسانی بر محیط‌زیست است معضلی روزافزون است که پیامدهای چون کم آبی، قحطی و کاهش امنیت غذایی را به دنبال دارد. از این رو شناخت و ارزیابی آن از اهمیت زیادی برخوردار است. در پژوهش حاضر با در نظر گرفتن شاخص‌های مختلف از جنبه‌ها های تخریب سرزمین و بیابان‌زایی شامل پتانسیل بیابانزایی (عوامل طبیعی،عوامل انسانی)، روند تخریب و وضعیت کنونی، خطر تخریب در حوزه آبخیز پردیسان بر اساس روش ارزیابی ریسک تخریب سرزمین (RALDE) بررسی شد. ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ تخریب در قالب معیارها و شاخص های مربوط به جنبه های تخریب مذکور در جداولی ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪیﻫﺎی ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ اﯾﺮان و ﺟﻬﺎن ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺪل ﻓﺎﺋﻮ-ﯾﻮﻧﭗ، ﻣﺪل ارزیابی تخریب در مناطق خشک (LADA) و روش ایرانی ارزیابی پتانسیل بیابانزایی (IMDPA) و برخی ﭘﺎراﻣﺘﺮﻫﺎی آﻣﺎری امتیازدهی شدند. با تلفیق لایه های اﺻﻠﯽ و اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﯽ ﻻﯾﻪﻫﺎ، ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺗﺨﺮﯾﺐ ﺳﺮزﻣﯿﻦ ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺗﻬﯿﻪ ﺷﺪ. نتایج نشان داد که با توجه به اثرات پرژوه های آبخیزداری انجام شده در دهه گذشته 03/73 درصد از سطح منطقه در معرض خطر ناچیز و کم، 9/25 درصد در معرض خطر متوسط و 07/1 درصد در معرض خطر شدید تخریب قرار دارند. با توجه به اینکه در بیش از یک چهارم سطح حوزه آبخیز پردیسان که دارای شرایط اقلیمی نیمه خشک تا خشک فراسرد و محدودیت‌های منابع خاک، آب و پوشش گیاهی است، خطر تخریب متوسط است، در صورت عدم انجام اقدامات مدیریتی مناسب و کنترل روند تخریب سرزمین به زودی شاهد تخریب شدید خواهد بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Land Degradation Assessment In Pardisan Watershed By Risk Assessment of Land Degradation Method (RALDE)

نویسنده English

Shima Nikoo 1
1 Desert Studies Faculty, Semnan University
چکیده English

Background and Objectives: Background and purpose: Land degradation, as one of the serious and common environmental problems in the world, has affected two billion hectares (22.5%) of agricultural lands, rangelands and forests in the world (Dregne et al., 1991; Oldeman et al., 1991; Reynolds and Stafford,2002). Land degradation indicators should be determined, selected and evaluated for the purpose of land management and used by researchers. Considering that in any region at risk of desertification, according to the specific environmental and management conditions governing it, it is necessary to identify the factors of desertification and the intensity of the effect of each factor in order to choose the appropriate measures to control and prevent degradation. In this research, the indicators of land degradation were determined using the RALDE model for the Pardisan watershed, which has sensitive and fragile environmental conditions against desertification factors and the risk of land degradation was determined.
Materials and Methods: Pardisan watershed with an area of 222.87 km2 is located in the northwest of Qom province. Its climate is arid and hyper-cold. Based on the RALDE model, eight main parameters of soil and land, climate, vegetation, underground water, population, grazing pressure, development and socio-economic were examined to prepare the land degradation potential map. After collecting data, existing maps and information on hydrology, soil, geology, vegetation, population, meteorology, etc. and their interpretation, field studies were conducted. Then scoring indicators and criteria of degradation and its evaluation was done based on natural factors, human factors and trend factor according to the quantitative tables of the RALDE model. Finally, by combining the information of the layers of human factors, environmental factors, the process of land degradation and the current state, a map of land degradation capability was prepared.
Results: The results showed that the risk of natural factors is moderate in more than half of the area, and severe and very severe in 31% of the area. Also, in 38% of the area, the risk of human factors is medium, which especially this area should be considered for control measures and prevention of further degradation. Investigating the process of degradation using changes in the NDVI index in the period from 2002 to 2016 and field studies investigating the state of vegetation showed that in 55% of the area, the risk of degradation is moderate and in 12%, the risk is severe and very severe. The current state of land degradation in the region is mostly in the range of low risk with a probability of 80-100% and severe risk with a probability of 0-20%. Finally, in about three-fourths of the area, the risk of degradation is low and in one-fourth of the area, the degradation is moderate. Severe and very severe risk of destruction was observed only at less than one percent of the area.
Conclusion: Natural degradation risk factors have a greater impact on the destruction of the region compared to human factors. Among these, climate and soil are the most important limiting natural factors. Although only about 1% of the area is in severe danger of degradation due to various protection and restoration measures in a large area of the region, the investigation of the degradation process using the evaluation of vegetation changes showed that in 55% of the area, An average of 4% of the vegetation was destroyed during the years 2002 to 2016. These results show that in most of Pardisan watershed, land resources have not been properly managed and exploited, and if the current trend continues, we will see widespread degradation and loss of resources soon.

[1]          Abasabadi, M.R. (2000). Quantitative evaluation of desertification in Aqqola-Gomishan plain to provide a regional model, Ms.c thesis, Tehran University. [In Persian]
[2]          Asar, Z., & Masoudi, M. (2017). Assessment of livestock pressure and its effect on desertification hazard, case study ‎area: Miyandehi Feizabad, Khorasan Razavi. Range and watershed management, 70(2), 411-421. doi 10.22059/jrwm.2017.203982.994 .  [In Persian]
[3]          Behmanesh, B., Abedi Sarvestanib, A., Sharafatmandradc, M., Shahrakid, M.R., & Hajili-Davajie, A. (2016). Assessment of Rangeland Degradation Indicators using Exploiters’ View between Authorized and Unauthorized Exploiters (Case Study: Saryqmish Winter Rangelands, Golestan Province, Iran). Desert, 21(2),105-113. doi:10.22059/JDESERT.2016.60346 . [In Persian]
[4]          Behnke, R.H., & Scoones, I. (1993). Rethinking range ecology: Implications for rangeland management in Africa. International Institute for Environment and Development, Environment working, 53, 1-37.
[5]          Dennis, P., Jeffrey Thorpe, Sh., & Kirychuk, B. (2006). Rangeland, Livestock and Herders Revisited in the Northern Pastoral Region of China. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-39. 2006.
[6]          Dregne, H., kassas, M., & Rozanov, B. (1991). A new assessment of the world status of desertification. desertification Control Bulletin, 20, 6-18.
[7]          Eskandari Damaneh, H., Gholami, H., Mahdavi, R., Khoorani A., & Li, J. (2019). Evaluation of land degradation trend using satellite imagery and climatic data (Case study: Fars province). Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal, 8 (24), 49-64. doi: 10.22052/deej.2018.7.24.35 . [In Persian]
[8]          Hashemi, Z., Pahlevanravi, A., Moghaddamnia, A., javadi, M.R., & Miri, A. (2015). Investigation of the Desertification Potential Using IMDPA Model in Sistan Plain (Case Study: Zahak). Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal, 3 (5), 49-62. [In Persian]
[9]          Helmut, J.G., & Lambin, L.E. (2004). Dynamic causual patterns of Desertification. BioScience Journal, 54(9), 817-829.
[10]      Hubert, G. (2003). Land degradation assessment in Drylands. Land and Water Development Devision, FAO.
[11]      Kamali Maskooni, E., Kamali, M. A., & Khanamani, A. (2021). Investigation and Preparation of Desertification Map Based on Iranian Model of Desertification Potential (IMDPA) with an emphasis on two criteria of soil and vegetation (Case study: Faryab-Kerman Province). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(12). doi:163-178. 0.22034/JEST.2021.30618.3917 . [In Persian]
[12]      Khanamani, A., Karim Zadeh, H.R.  Jafari, R., & Golshahi, A. (2013). Quantitative assessment of current desertification using MEDALUS model (Case study: Segzi plain). Journal of Applied RS & GIS Techniques in Natural Resource Science. 4(1), 13-25. doi: 10.3390/su13147817 . [In Persian]
[13]      Koohbanani, H.R., Dashti Amirabad, J., Nikoo, Sh., &Taya, A., (2017). Desertification-Intensity Zoning through Fuzzy-Logic Approach: A Case Study of Deyhook-Tabas, Iran. Environmental Erosion Research Journal, 25(1), 35-49. ‎doi: 20.1001.1.22517812.1396.7.1.2.2 . [In Persian]
[14]      Ludwig, J.A., & Tongway, D.J. (1995). Spatial organization of landscapes and its function in semi-arid woodlands, Australia. Landscape Ecology, 10,51-63.
[15]      Masoudi, M. (2005). “Risk assessment of land degradation in parts of Mond basin Southern Iran”, Ph. D. thesis, Department of Environmental science, Pune University, India.
[16]      Mesbahzadeh, T., & Soleimani, F., (2018). Investigating desertification process of Khash plain with emphasis on water and vegetation criteria. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 71(2), 518-528. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2018.250853.1230. [In Persian]
[17]      Natural Resources and Watershed Management Organization, (2011).The detailed-executive plan of in Pardisan watershed-Qom province.
[18]      Nikoo, Sh., Azarnivand, H., Zehtabiyan, G.R., Ahmadi, H., & Zare Chahouki, M.A. (2015). Assessment of Current Desertification Status using IMDPA and Determination of Effective Factors of Land Degradation (Case Study: Damghan region). Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 67(4), 641-655. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2015.53480. [In Persian]
[19]      Oldeman, L.R., Hakkeling, R.T.A., & Sombroek W.G. (1991). “World map of the status human induced soil degradation: an explanatory note”. UNEP, International Soil Reference and Information Centre, Nairobi.
[20]      Pickup, G. (1989). New land degradation survey techniques for arid Australia: problems and prospects. The Australian Rangeland Journal, 11: 74-82.
[21]      Reed, M. S., & Dougill, A. J. (2003). Integrating community and scientific sustainability indicators to facilitate participatory desertification monitoring and sustainable rangeland management in Botswana. Seventh international rangeland congress, Durban, South Africa, 1868-1871.
[22]      Reynolds, J.F., & Stafford Smith, D.M. (2002). Global Desertification: Do Humans Cause Deserts?, Dahlem University Press, Berlin, 88, 437-459.
[23]      Shakerian, N., Zehtabian, G., Zareh Chahooki, M. A., & Khosravi, H. (2017). Determine the most important criteria and indicators that influence land degradation and desertification. Journal of Range and Watershed Managment, 70(2), 385-398. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2017.352966.1125.[In Persian]
[24]      Shirgir, S., & Masoudi, M. (2021). Hazard Assessment of Desertification Using the New Model of Proposed MEDALUS. Watershed Management Research Journal, 34(3), 133-148. doi:10.22092/WMEJ.2021.352966.1381. [In Persian]
[25]      Sojasi qeidari, H., & Faal Jalali, A. (2018). Assessing the Villagers’ Environmental Behavior and Awareness (Case Study: Zanglanloo Rural District). Spatial Planning, 8(1), 29-50.  https://doi.org/10.22108/sppl.2018.107906.1129. [In Persian]
[26]      Talebanfard, A. A., Akbari, M., & Azami rad, M. (2022). Sensitivity Areas Assessment of Desertification Using ESAs Model and Prioritizing Management Strategies (Case study: Kavir-e- Namak Basin, Khorasan Razavi Province). Desert Management, 10(2), 1-20. doi: 10.22034/JDMAL.2022.549710.1377. [In Persian]
[27]      UNCED (1992). Managing fragile ecosystems: combating desertification and drought Agenda 21, Chapter 12 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.
[28]      Zolfaghari, F., & Khosravi, H. (2016). Assessment of Desertification Severity Using IMDPA Model in Saravan Region. Geography and Environmental planning, 27(2), 87-102.  doi: 10.22108/GEP.2016.21817. [In Persian]

  • تاریخ دریافت 18 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری 15 مهر 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 آذر 1402